You may also see phrases such as medical grade, lab-grade, clinically inspired, research-backed, doctor recommended, professional quality or third-party tested.
Some of these claims may be useful, but only if the company explains exactly what they mean.
For example, “medical grade” might refer to the battery, foam, material, manufacturing environment or another component of the device. That may be relevant for safety or build quality, but it does not automatically mean the PEMF signal itself is better. Andy gave a good example on the podcast: a device can contain a medical-grade battery, but it is still a battery. The phrase may sound impressive, but it does not necessarily tell you anything about the quality of the PEMF signal.
The same applies to a wellness PEMF device being made in a medical-grade facility. That may be a positive sign from a manufacturing perspective, but the product can still be sold as a wellness device rather than a medical device. Medical manufacturing standards and medical device registration are related, but they are not the same thing.
“Third-party tested” is another claim that needs context. A product may be third-party tested for material safety, electrical safety, toxicology, packaging, battery safety or general compliance. Those are all important, but they are not the same as testing the PEMF signal itself. For a PEMF device, useful testing should ideally relate to things like intensity, frequency, waveform, slew rate, coil output, field distribution, signal cleanliness and dirty electricity.
So, if a brand says “third-party tested” but does not clearly explain what was tested, the claim is incomplete. This becomes even more questionable if the same product is missing basic PEMF specifications. If a company cannot list the intensity, waveform, slew rate or coil details, then “third-party tested” may have very little to do with the PEMF side of the device.
The more specific a claim is, the more useful it becomes. The more vague it is, the more careful you should be.